Article Sidebar

Download
PDF
Statistic
Read Counter : 0 Download : 0

Main Article Content

Abstract

This study aims to identify which AI tools Indonesian graduate students use for academic writing and how aware they are of AI's use in their writing. A survey was administered to 79 graduate students to collect data for this study. The results indicate that ChatGPT is the most frequently utilized AI model, alongside various others that help improve students’ English writing and comprehension skills. The participants also demonstrated an understanding of the necessity of engaging with AI-generated writing for their academic needs and acknowledged the importance of maintaining research ethics when employing these tools. In summary, students are effectively using AI chatbots, especially ChatGPT, to support their academic writing. Their significant awareness of AI's role suggests they recognize that human contribution is still crucial in the writing process. The results of this study provide valuable insights into the AI tools that enhance academic writing among graduate students in Indonesia. It also presents the level of graduate students’ awareness of the position of AI tools in academic writing. Thus, it is advisable to reassess research ethics regarding the extent to which generative AI models can be incorporated into academic writing. Given its educational implications, universities should develop guidelines for the ethical and appropriate use of AI and clarify AI support limitations within their educational frameworks.

Keywords

Academic Writing Artificial Intelligence Tools Ethical Awareness Graduate Students Indonesian EFL Context

Article Details

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

In submitting the manuscript to the FOSTER: Journal of English Language Teaching, the authors certify that:

  • They are authorized by their co-authors to enter into these arrangements.
  • The work described has not been formally published before, except in the form of an abstract or as part of a published lecture, review, thesis, or overlay journal.
  • That it is not under consideration for publication elsewhere,
  • The publication has been approved by the author(s) and by responsible authorities – tacitly or explicitly – of the institutes where the work has been carried out.
  • They secure the right to reproduce any material that has already been published or copyrighted elsewhere.
  • They agree to the following license and copyright agreement.

License and Copyright Agreement

Authors who publish with FOSTER: Journal of English Language Teaching agree to the following terms:

  1. Authors retain copyright and grant the FOSTER: Journal of English Language Teaching right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
  2. Authors can enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the FOSTER: Journal of English Language Teaching published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or edit it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
  3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) before and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
How to Cite
Muthmainnah, N., Risdianto, F., Muslim, A. B., Sholichah , A. L. A., & Ayu, E. W. N. (2026). AI Tools for Academic Writing: Insights from Indonesian Graduate Students . FOSTER: Journal of English Language Teaching, 7(2), 330-342. https://doi.org/10.24256/foster-jelt.v7i2.324
Crossref
Scopus
Google Scholar
Europe PMC

References

  1. Aktepe, B., & Çetinkaya, S. (2025). Graduate students and AI: Insights into academic writing practices. Education Mind, 2. https://doi.org/10.58583/EM.4.2.2
  2. Amyatun, R. L., & Kholis, A. (2023). Can artificial intelligence (AI) like QuillBot AI assist students’ writing skills? Assisting learning to write texts using AI. ELE Reviews: English Language Education Reviews, 3(2), 135–154. https://doi.org/10.22515/elereviews.v3i2.7533
  3. Ansorge, L., Ansorgeová, K., & Sixsmith, M. (2021). Plagiarism through paraphrasing tools—The story of one plagiarized text. Publications, 9(4), 48. https://doi.org/10.3390/publications9040048
  4. Asnas, S. A. M., & Hidayanti, I. (2024). Uncovering EFL students’ frequent difficulties in academic writing and the coping strategies: The case of a college in Indonesia. Journal on English as a Foreign Language, 14(1), 124–151. https://doi.org/10.23971/jefl.v14i1.7472
  5. Bista, K., & Bista, R. (2025). Leveraging AI tools in academic writing: Insights from doctoral students on benefits and challenges. American Journal of STEM Education, 6, 32–47. https://doi.org/10.32674/9m8dq081
  6. Bouteraa, M., Bin-Nashwan, S. A., Al-Daihani, M., Dirie, K. A., Benlahcene, A., Sadallah, M., Zaki, H. O., Lada, S., Ansar, R., Fook, L. M., & Chekima, B. (2024). Understanding the diffusion of AI-generative (ChatGPT) in higher education: Does students’ integrity matter? Computers in Human Behavior Reports, 14, 100402. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chbr.2024.100402
  7. Budjalemba, A. S., & Listyani, L. (2020). Factors contributing to students difficulties in academic writing class: Students perception. UC Journal: ELT, Linguistics and Literature Journal, 1(2), 135–149. https://doi.org/10.24071/uc.v1i2.2966
  8. Cakrawala Pendidikan, E. T. (2021). Author guideline [Journal website]. Cakrawala Pendidikan. https://journal.uny.ac.id/index.php/cp/pages/view/authorguidelines
  9. Chauke, T. A., Mkhize, T. R., Methi, L., & Dlamini, N. (2024). Postgraduate students’ perceptions on the benefits associated with artificial intelligence tools on academic success: In case of ChatGPT AI tool. Journal of Curriculum Studies Research, 6(1), 44–59. https://doi.org/10.46303/jcsr.2024.4
  10. Coman, E. (2023). Exploring the impact in academic writing: A scientometric analysis. Revista Universitara de Sociologie, (3), 93–100.
  11. Cukurova, M., Kent, C., & Luckin, R. (2019). Artificial intelligence and multimodal data in the service of human decision‐making: A case study in debate tutoring. British Journal of Educational Technology, 50(6), 3032–3046. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12829
  12. Dorado, L. B. (2024). Lived experienced of graduate students in writing their academic research paper using artificial intelligence (AI) tools. Research and Education Sustainability: Unlocking Opportunities in Shaping Today’s Generation Decision Making and Building Connections. 11th International Scholar Conference. https://jurnal.unai.edu/isc/article/view/3494/2368
  13. Eltahir, M. E. (2019). E-learning in developing countries: Is it a panacea? A case study of Sudan. IEEE Access, 7, 97784–97792. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2019.2930411
  14. Fitriana, K., & Nurazni, L. (2022). Exploring students’ perception of using grammarly to check grammar in their writing. JET (Journal of English Teaching), 8(1), 15–25. https://doi.org/10.33541/jet.v8i1.3044
  15. Fleckenstein, J., Meyer, J., Jansen, T., Keller, S. D., Köller, O., & Möller, J. (2024). Do teachers spot AI? Evaluating the detectability of AI-generated texts among student essays. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 6, 100209. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2024.100209
  16. Gasaymeh, A.-M. M., Beirat, M. A., & Abu Qbeita, A. A. (2024). University students’ insights of generative artificial intelligence (AI) writing tools. Education Sciences, 14(10), 1062. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci14101062
  17. Guo, H., & Zaini, S. H. (2024). Artificial intelligence in academic writing: A literature review. Asian Pendidikan, 4(2), 46–55. https://doi.org/10.53797/aspen.v4i2.6.2024
  18. Imran, M., & Almusharraf, N. (2023). Analyzing the role of ChatGPT as a writing assistant at higher education level: A systematic review of the literature. Contemporary Educational Technology, 15(4), ep464. https://doi.org/10.30935/cedtech/13605
  19. Khalifa, M., & Albadawy, M. (2024). Using artificial intelligence in academic writing and research: An essential productivity tool. Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine Update, 5, 100145. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cmpbup.2024.100145
  20. Listiyanti AD, F. I., Sudirman, A. M., & Khaerat, N. U. (2025). Integrating artificial Intelligence to enhance students’ English writing competence: Evidence from a quasi experimental study. FOSTER JELT: Journal of English Language Teaching, 6(4), 331–343.
  21. Ministry of Research and Technology and Education of the Republic of Indonesia. (2018). Peraturan Menteri Riset, Teknologi, dan Pendidikan Tinggi Republik Indonesia Nomor 50 Tahun 2018 tentang Perubahan atas Peraturan Menteri Riset, Teknologi, dan Pendidikan Tinggi Nomor 44 Tahun 2015 tentang Standar Nasional Pendidikan Tinggi [Regulation of the Minister of Research, Technology, and Higher Education of the Republic of Indonesia Number 50 of 2018 concerning Amendments to Regulation of the Minister of Research, Technology, and Higher Education Number 44 of 2015 concerning National Standards for Higher Education]. https://peraturan.bpk.go.id/Details/140587/permen-ristekdikti-no-50-tahun-2018
  22. Mondal, H., & Mondal, S. (2023). ChatGPT in academic writing: Maximizing its benefits and minimizing the risks. Indian Journal of Ophthalmology, 71(12), 3600–3606. https://doi.org/10.4103/IJO.IJO_718_23
  23. Moorhouse, B. L., Wan, Y., Wu, C., Wu, M., & Ho, T. Y. (2025). Generative AI tools and empowerment in L2 academic writing. System, 133, 103779. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2025.103779
  24. Narayan, S. (2024). Awareness and familiarity with AI writing tools among media students. LinguaEducare: Journal of English and Linguistic Studies, 1(1), 39–50. https://doi.org/10.63324/lec.1v.1i.5
  25. Ningrum, R. W., Hamamah, H., Sahiruddin, S., & Rohmah, Z. (2023). Academic writing difficulties for Indonesian students in pursuing postgraduate studies abroad. Premise: Journal of English Education, 12(1), 93. https://doi.org/10.24127/pj.v12i1.5271
  26. Ningsih, S., Rahayu, A. P., Suryani, N. Y., Martriwati, M., Sholikhah, M., & Khairas, E. E. (2024). Indonesian students’ perceptions on the use of artificial intelligence (AI) in English learning. In M. Hasyim (Ed.), Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Linguistics and Culture (ICLC-4 2023) (Vol. 839, pp. 124–132). Atlantis Press SARL. https://doi.org/10.2991/978-2-38476-251-4_18
  27. Pratiwi, H., Suherman, Hasruddin, & Ridha, M. (2025). Between shortcut and ethics: Navigating the use of artificial intelligence in academic writing among Indonesian doctoral students. European Journal of Education, 60(2), e70083. https://doi.org/10.1111/ejed.70083
  28. Roe, J., & Perkins, M. (2022). What are automated paraphrasing tools and how do we address them? A review of a growing threat to academic integrity. International Journal for Educational Integrity, 18(1), 15. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40979-022-00109-w
  29. Santiago-Ruiz, E. (2023). Writing with ChatGPT in a context of educational inequality and digital divide. International Journal of Education and Development Using Information and Communication Technology, 19(3), 28–38.
  30. Sanusi, I. T., Olaleye, S. A., Agbo, F. J., & Chiu, T. K. F. (2022). The role of learners’ competencies in artificial intelligence education. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 3, 100098. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2022.100098
  31. Shaheen, M. (2021). The concept of originality in academic research of engineering. Education Research International, 2021, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/9462201
  32. Singh, M. (2023). Maintaining the integrity of the South African university: The impact of ChatGPT on plagiarism and scholarly writing. South African Journal of Higher Education, 37(5). https://doi.org/10.20853/37-5-5941
  33. Song, C., & Song, Y. (2023). Enhancing academic writing skills and motivation: Assessing the efficacy of ChatGPT in AI-assisted language learning for EFL students. Frontiers in Psychology, 14, 01–14. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1260843
  34. Sumakul, D. T. Y. G., Hamied, F. A., & Sukyadi, D. (2022). Students’ Perceptions of the Use of AI in a Writing Class: 67th TEFLIN International Virtual Conference & the 9th ICOELT 2021 (TEFLIN ICOELT 2021). https://doi.org/10.2991/assehr.k.220201.009
  35. Tokdemir Demirel, E. (2024). The use and perceptions towards AI tools for academic writing among university students. Innovations in Language Teaching Journal, 1(1), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.53463/innovltej.20240328
  36. Tran, H. N., Le, T. T. N., & Tran, V. B. U. (2025). AI Tools in learning academic writing: Benefits and challenges for MA students in the English language studies at the Industrial University of Ho Chi Minh City. International Journal of AI in Language Education, 2(1), 74–91. https://doi.org/10.54855/ijaile.25215
  37. Utami, S. P. T., Andayani, A., Winarni, R., & Sumarwati, S. (2023). Utilization of artificial intelligence technology in an academic writing class: How do Indonesian students perceive? Contemporary Educational Technology, 15(4), ep450. https://doi.org/10.30935/cedtech/13419
  38. Wahyuningsih, S. (2024). How artificial intelligence (AI) supports undergraduate students’ academic writing: Evidence from Indonesia. Prominent, 7(2), 72–84. https://doi.org/10.24176/pro.v7i2.11444
  39. Wirantaka, A., & Fijanah, M. S. (2021). Effective Use of Google Translate in Writing. International Conference on Sustainable Innovation Track Humanities Education and Social Sciences (ICSIHESS 2021). https://doi.org/10.2991/assehr.k.211227.003
  40. Wu, C., Moorhouse, B. L., Wan, Y., & Wu, M. (2026). Exploring PhD students’ utilization of generative AI in academic writing for publication purposes: Insights for EAP. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 79, 101612. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2025.101612