Article Sidebar

Download
PDF
Statistic
Read Counter : 0 Download : 0

Main Article Content

Abstract

This study investigates the effect of AI-assisted critical reading on EFL students’ argumentative writing performance. Although previous studies have explored AI in language learning, limited research has specifically examined its role in integrating critical reading with argumentative writing in EFL contexts, particularly using a mixed-methods approach. Employing a mixed-methods approach with an explanatory sequential design, the study involved 50 undergraduate students from Institut Bisnis dan Komputer Indonesia, divided into an experimental group and a control group. The experimental group received instruction through AI-assisted critical reading, while the control group was taught using conventional methods. Data were collected through writing tests (pre-test and post-test) and semi-structured interviews. The quantitative data were analyzed using paired and independent sample t-tests, while the qualitative data were analyzed thematically. The findings revealed that the experimental group showed significantly greater improvement in writing performance compared to the control group, with a large effect size. The results also indicated that AI-assisted critical reading enhanced students’ ability to analyze texts, generate ideas, and organize arguments effectively. In addition, students reported positive perceptions, including increased engagement, confidence, and motivation in learning. This study contributes to the growing body of literature by demonstrating the effectiveness of AI as a cognitive and pedagogical tool that supports the integration of reading and writing processes in EFL contexts.

Keywords

AI-Assisted Learning Critical Reading Argumentative Writing EFL Students Mixed-Methods

Article Details

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

In submitting the manuscript to the FOSTER: Journal of English Language Teaching, the authors certify that:

  • They are authorized by their co-authors to enter into these arrangements.
  • The work described has not been formally published before, except in the form of an abstract or as part of a published lecture, review, thesis, or overlay journal.
  • That it is not under consideration for publication elsewhere,
  • The publication has been approved by the author(s) and by responsible authorities – tacitly or explicitly – of the institutes where the work has been carried out.
  • They secure the right to reproduce any material that has already been published or copyrighted elsewhere.
  • They agree to the following license and copyright agreement.

License and Copyright Agreement

Authors who publish with FOSTER: Journal of English Language Teaching agree to the following terms:

  1. Authors retain copyright and grant the FOSTER: Journal of English Language Teaching right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
  2. Authors can enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the FOSTER: Journal of English Language Teaching published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or edit it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
  3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) before and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
How to Cite
Lutfiyah, Palupi, T. M., Cahyani, A. N., Fitria Rahmawati, & Zalukhu, A. (2026). AI-Assisted Critical Reading in Enhancing EFL Students’ Argumentative Writing: A Mixed-Methods Study. FOSTER: Journal of English Language Teaching, 7(2), 710-722. https://doi.org/10.24256/foster-jelt.v7i2.419
Crossref
Scopus
Google Scholar
Europe PMC

References

  1. Atalisi Zalukhu, Jubil Ezer Sihite, Uswatun Hasanah, A. N. C. (2025). Improving Students’ Business Letter Writing through a Genre-Based Approach. 5(3), 275–281.
  2. Banihashem, S. K., Kerman, N. T., Noroozi, O., Moon, J., & Drachsler, H. (2024). Feedback sources in essay writing: peer-generated or AI-generated feedback? International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 21(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-024-00455-4
  3. Bereiter, C., & Scardamalia, M. (2013). The psychology of written composition. Routledge.
  4. Boulton, A., & Cobb, T. (2017). Corpus use in language learning: A meta-analysis. Language Teaching, 50(3), 348–393. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0261444816000163
  5. Chaparro-Banegas, N., Mas-Tur, A., & Roig-Tierno, N. (2024). Challenging critical thinking in education: new paradigms of artificial intelligence. Cogent Education, 11(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2024.2437899
  6. Chapelle, C. A. (2016). 20 YEARS OF TECHNOLOGY AND LANGUAGE ASSESSMENT IN LANGUAGE LEARNING & TECHNOLOGY. 20(2), 116–128. http://llt.msu.edu/issues/june2016/chapellevoss.pdfhttp://llt.msu.edu/issues/june2016/chapellevoss.pdf
  7. Darwin, S. (2024). Integrating critical thinking and artificial intelligence in higher education: A bibliometric and systematic review of skills and strategies. In Social Sciences and Humanities Open (Vol. 12). Elsevier Ltd. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssaho.2025.101924
  8. Feng, W., Chen, H., & Yu, S. (2025). Artificial intelligence in ESL/EFL writing instruction: Evidence from recent reviews. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 6, 100178.
  9. Flower, L., & Hayes, J. R. (1981). A cognitive process theory of writing. College Composition and Communication, 32(4), 365–387.
  10. Godwin-Jones, R. (2018). Using mobile technology to develop language skills. Language Learning & Technology, 22(3), 1–17.
  11. Grabe, W., & Zhang, C. (2016). Reading-writing relationships in first and second language academic literacy development. Language Teaching, 49(3), 339–355. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0261444816000082
  12. Graham, S. (2018). Effective Writing Instruction for All Students Written for Renaissance Learning. www.renlearn.com
  13. Hirvela, A. (2016). Connecting reading and writing in second language writing instruction. University of Michigan Press.
  14. Hyland, K. (2022). Teaching and researching writing (4th ed.). Routledge.
  15. Jeon, E. Y. (2025a). Artificial Intelligence in ESL/EFL Education: Evidence from Recent Reviews (2024–2025). International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research, 24(10), 509–526. https://doi.org/10.26803/ijlter.24.10.24
  16. Jeon, E. Y. (2025b). Artificial Intelligence in ESL/EFL Education: Evidence from Recent Reviews (2024–2025). International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research, 24(10), 509–526. https://doi.org/10.26803/ijlter.24.10.24
  17. Jiang, R. (2022). How does artificial intelligence empower EFL teaching and learning nowadays? A review on artificial intelligence in the EFL context.
  18. Kasneci, E., Sessler, K., Küchemann, S., Bannert, M., Dementieva, D., Fischer, F., & Kasneci, G. (2023). ChatGPT for good? On opportunities and challenges of large language models for education. Learning and Individual Differences, 103, 102274. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2023.102274
  19. Kellogg, R. T. (2018). Cognitive processes in writing: A framework for research and instruction. Journal of Writing Research, 10(3), 473–497.
  20. Kohnke, L., Moorhouse, B. L., & Zou, D. (2023). ChatGPT and generative artificial intelligence in language education: Opportunities and challenges. TESOL Journal, 14(3), e00377. https://doi.org/10.1002/tesj.377
  21. Lee, D., & Swales, J. (2020). A corpus-based approach to academic writing instruction. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 45, 100845. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2020.100845
  22. Li, J., Huang, J., Wu, W., & Whipple, P. B. (2024). Evaluating the role of ChatGPT in enhancing EFL writing assessments in classroom settings: A preliminary investigation. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 11(1). https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-024-03755-2
  23. Mekheimer, M. (2025). Generative AI-assisted feedback and EFL writing: a study on proficiency, revision frequency and writing quality. Discover Education, 4(1). https://doi.org/10.1007/s44217-025-00602-7
  24. McEnery, T., & Brezina, V. (2022). Corpus linguistics: Method, theory and practice. Cambridge University Press.
  25. Nazari, M., Shabbir, M. S., & Setiawan, R. (2024). AI-supported learning and the development of critical thinking in EFL contexts. Education and Information Technologies, 29, 4567–4585. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-023-12000-0
  26. Pawestri, P., & Pratolo, B. W. (2024). Artificial Intelligence (AI) for EFL Writing Skills: Systematic Literature Review. Ahmad Dahlan Journal of English Studies, 11(2), 43–52. https://doi.org/10.26555/adjes.v12i2.1460
  27. Pérez-Paredes, P. (2022). A systematic review of the uses and spread of corpora and data-driven learning in CALL research during 2011–2015. Language Teaching, 55(1), 36–57. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0261444821000242
  28. Pérez-Paredes, P. (2026). Corpus linguistics and AI in the reconfiguration of language learning ecologies. Language Teaching. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1017/S026144482500010X
  29. Ranalli, J. (2021). Automated written corrective feedback: How well can students make use of it? Computer Assisted Language Learning, 34(5–6), 1–25. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2019.1614066
  30. Salido, A., Syarif, I., Sitepu, M. S., Suparjan, Wana, P. R., Taufika, R., & Melisa, R. (2025). Integrating critical thinking and artificial intelligence in higher education: A bibliometric and systematic review of skills and strategies. In Social Sciences and Humanities Open (Vol. 12). Elsevier Ltd. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssaho.2025.101924
  31. Werdiningsih, Y., Anugerahwati, M., & Prayogo, J. A. (2024). The integration of AI in academic writing: Impacts on students’ critical thinking. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 68, 101345.
  32. Zalukhul, A., Rahmawati2, F., Arianti3, Y., & Cahyani4, A. N. (2026). Multimodal Reading Texts And Efl Undergraduates’ Academic Writing Development: A Qualitative Case Study In Indonesia. In Jurnal SuluhPendidikan (JSP) (Vol. 14, Number 1).