Article Sidebar

Download
PDF
Statistic
Read Counter : 0 Download : 0

Main Article Content

Abstract

Writing is a challenging skill for students in English as a Foreign Language (EFL) contexts, particularly in producing recount texts due to difficulties in generating ideas, organizing content, and applying appropriate language features. This study aims to investigate the effect of Problem-Based Learning (PBL) on students’ recount text writing skills. A quantitative pre-experimental design with a one-group pretest–posttest approach was employed, involving 32 tenth-grade students. The data were collected through writing tests and analyzed using descriptive and inferential statistics, including the Wilcoxon Signed-Rank Test. The findings revealed a statistically significant difference between pre-test and post-test scores; however, the results indicated a decline in students’ writing performance after the implementation of PBL. This suggests that PBL, in this context, was not effective in improving students’ recount text writing skills. The findings highlight that the effectiveness of PBL is influenced by factors such as the duration of implementation, the level of instructional scaffolding, and students’ readiness to engage in student-centered learning. Therefore, it is recommended that PBL be implemented gradually with sufficient guidance and longer duration to achieve optimal results. This study contributes to the understanding of the practical challenges in applying student-centered learning approaches in EFL writing classrooms.

Keywords

EFL Writing Instruction Problem-Based Learning (PBL) Recount Text Student-Centered Learning Writing Skills

Article Details

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

In submitting the manuscript to the FOSTER: Journal of English Language Teaching, the authors certify that:

  • They are authorized by their co-authors to enter into these arrangements.
  • The work described has not been formally published before, except in the form of an abstract or as part of a published lecture, review, thesis, or overlay journal.
  • That it is not under consideration for publication elsewhere,
  • The publication has been approved by the author(s) and by responsible authorities – tacitly or explicitly – of the institutes where the work has been carried out.
  • They secure the right to reproduce any material that has already been published or copyrighted elsewhere.
  • They agree to the following license and copyright agreement.

License and Copyright Agreement

Authors who publish with FOSTER: Journal of English Language Teaching agree to the following terms:

  1. Authors retain copyright and grant the FOSTER: Journal of English Language Teaching right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
  2. Authors can enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the FOSTER: Journal of English Language Teaching published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or edit it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
  3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) before and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
How to Cite
Syahrani, D. A., Johan, A. N., & Basuki. (2026). Investigating the Effect of Problem-Based Learning on Students’ Recount Writing Skills in an Indonesian EFL Classroom. FOSTER: Journal of English Language Teaching, 7(2), 536-546. https://doi.org/10.24256/foster-jelt.v7i2.411
Crossref
Scopus
Google Scholar
Europe PMC

References

  1. Abdel Latif, M. M. M. (2021). Remodeling writers’ composing processes: Implications for writing assessment. Assessing Writing, 50, 100547. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asw.2021.100547
  2. Balqis, N. A., Putri, S. R. E., Ruddin, M., Navi, M. W., Suharwati, I., Ahmadi, R., & Sari, I. N. (2025). Efektivitas Model Project Based Learning Berbantuan Wordwall dalam Meningkatkan Keterampilan Menulis Teks Rekon pada Siswa. Jurnal Kajian Bahasa, Sastra, Dan Budaya Daerah Serta Pengajarannya, 16(1), 51–60. DOI:http://doi.org/10.17509/jlb.v16i1.80784
  3. Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2022). Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches. SAGE Publications.
  4. Dash, B., & Schmidt, K. (2025). Evolving Teaching with AI Agents: Reinforcement Learning for Adaptive Educational Support Systems. ELearn: World Conference on EdTech, 95–108.
  5. Dolmans, D. H. J. M., Loyens, S. M. M., Marcq, H., & Gijbels, D. (2016). Deep and surface learning in problem-based learning: a review of the literature. Advances in Health Sciences Education, 21(5), 1087–1112.
  6. Fatmawati, M., Irdiyansyah, I., & Sofyan, D. (2022). The Use of Genre Based Approach on Students’ Writing Recount Achievement. Journal of English Teaching and Linguistics Studies (JET Li), 4(1), 1–6. https://doi.org/10.55215/jetli.v4i1.5077
  7. Field, A. (2024). Discovering Statistics Using IBM SPSS Statistics. SAGE Publications.
  8. Fraenkel, J. R., & Wallen, N. E. (2019). How to design and evaluate research in education. (10th ed.). ERIC.
  9. Graham, S. (2018). A revised writer (s)-within-community model of writing. Educational Psychologist, 53(4), 258–279.
  10. Graham, S., Bañales, G., Ahumada, S., Muñoz, P., Alvarez, P., & Harris, K. R. (2020). Writing strategies interventions. In Handbook of strategies and strategic processing (pp. 141–158). Routledge.
  11. Graham, S., Kiuhara, S. A., & MacKay, M. (2020). The effects of writing on learning in science, social studies, and mathematics: A meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research, 90(2), 179–226.
  12. Guo, Q., Jamil, H., Ismail, L., Luo, S., & Sun, Z. (2024). Effects of problem-based learning on EFL learning: A systematic review. PLOS ONE, 19. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0307819
  13. Hakimah, N. (2023). Assessing the Impact of Project-Based Learning on Students’ Writing Skills: A Pre-Experimental Study. Acitya: Journal of Teaching and Education, 5(2), 434–448. https://doi.org/10.30650/ajte.v5i2.3723
  14. Hmelo-Silver, C. E. (2017). Problem-based learning: What and how do students learn? Educational Psychology Review, 16(3), 235–266.
  15. Hyland, K. (2019). Second Language Writing. Cambridge University Press.
  16. Hyland, K. (2021). Teaching and Researching Writing. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003198451
  17. Ilham, I. (2025). The Impact Of Project-Based Learning On Efl Students’ Writing Skill: A Systematic Review. ELTIN JOURNAL: Journal of English Language Teaching in Indonesia p-ISSN, 13(2), 355–366.
  18. Lazonder, A. W., & Harmsen, R. (2016). Meta-analysis of inquiry-based learning: Effects of guidance. Review of Educational Research, 86(3), 681–718.
  19. Lee, I. (2020). Journal of Second Language Writing Utility of focused / comprehensive written corrective feedback. 49(February).
  20. Lehman, I. M., Tienari, J., Hyland, K., & Alejandro, A. (2024). The case for reflexive writing practices in management communication and organization studies. Management Communication Quarterly, 38(3), 698–729.
  21. Morris, T. H., Bremner, N., & Sakata, N. (2025). Self-directed learning and student-centred learning : a conceptual comparison. Pedagogy, Culture & Society, 33(3), 847–866. https://doi.org/10.1080/14681366.2023.2282439
  22. Nguyen, L. A. T., & Habók, A. (2022). Digital Literacy of EFL Students: An Empirical Study in Vietnamese Universities. Libri, 72(1), 53–66. https://doi.org/10.1515/libri-2020-0165
  23. Nuryadi, N., Astuti, T. D., Utami, E. S., & Budiantara, M. (2017). Dasar-dasar statistik penelitian. Yogyakarta: Sibuku Media, 27–28.
  24. Pallant, J. (2020). SPSS survival manual: A step by step guide to data analysis using IBM SPSS. Routledge.
  25. Panadero, E. (2017). A review of self-regulated learning: Six models and four directions for research. Frontiers in Psychology, 8(APR), 1–28. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00422
  26. Quibrantar, S. M., & Ezezika, O. (2023). Evaluating student engagement and experiential learning in global classrooms: A qualitative case study. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 78, 101290. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2023.101290
  27. Soffiany, N. K., & Purbani, W. (2020). The effectiveness of project-based learning to teach writing in relation to students’ creativity. LingTera, 7(2), 205–214. https://doi.org/10.21831/lt.v7i2.14967
  28. Sun, Q., & Zhang, L. J. (2022). Understanding learners’ metacognitive experiences in learning to write in English as a foreign language: A structural equation modeling approach. Frontiers in Psychology, 13(September), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.986301
  29. Susanti, A., Rofidah, N., Trisusana, A., & Retnaningdyah, P. (2020). Improving Students’ Writing Skill Through Project Based Learning For EFLStudents. International Journal of English Linguistics, Literature, and Education (IJELLE), 2(2), 102–115. https://doi.org/10.32585/ijelle.v2i2.700
  30. Sweller, J. (2020). Cognitive load theory and educational technology. Educational Technology Research and Development, 68(1), 1–16.
  31. Yew, E., & Goh, K. (2016). Problem-Based Learning: An Overview of its Process and Impact on Learning. Health Professions Education, 2. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hpe.2016.01.004